SEARCH
You are in browse mode. You must login to use MEMORY

   Log in to start

Buratti


🇬🇧
In English
Created:


Public
Created by:
Chiara Francucci


0 / 5  (0 ratings)



» To start learning, click login

1 / 25

[Front]


Marbury vs Madison (1804)
[Back]


Marshall defines the constitution as a paramount law, judicial review of legislation

Practice Known Questions

Stay up to date with your due questions

Complete 5 questions to enable practice

Exams

Exam: Test your skills

Test your skills in exam mode

Learn New Questions

Dynamic Modes

SmartIntelligent mix of all modes
CustomUse settings to weight dynamic modes

Manual Mode [BETA]

The course owner has not enabled manual mode
Specific modes

Learn with flashcards
Complete the sentence
Listening & SpellingSpelling: Type what you hear
multiple choiceMultiple choice mode
SpeakingAnswer with voice
Speaking & ListeningPractice pronunciation
TypingTyping only mode

Buratti - Leaderboard

1 user has completed this course

No users have played this course yet, be the first


Buratti - Details

Levels:

Questions:

29 questions
🇬🇧🇬🇧
Marbury vs Madison (1804)
Marshall defines the constitution as a paramount law, judicial review of legislation
McCullok vs. Maryland (1819)
Enlargement of the supreme court supremacy, necessary and proper clause
Fletcher vs. Peck (1810)
Supreme court apply the principle Marbury vs Madison to state statuary law
Barron vs. Baltimore (1833)
The federal bill of rights could not have been applied to the legislation of the state
Scott vs Sanford (1857)
The supreme court stated that the federation had no power to establish rules over state law on the issue of slavery
Plessy vs Ferguson (1896)
Supreme court declare that the two communities are “separate but equal”, a black man take a seat on a white bus.
Lochner vs New York (1905)
The supreme court, who upheld the liberal economy, declared null the act of the state of New York which had introduced a maximum of working hours for backers.
Brown vs. Board of education of Topeka (1954)
Declared that the division in school system between black and white is unconstitutional
Loving vs Virginia (1967)
The court abolish the state law prohibiting interracial marriage
Roe vs Wade (1973)
About the right of abortion
Hobergefell vs Hodges (2005)
About the same sax marriage
McDonald vs Chicago (2010)
Incorporation of the right to bears arms
Buckley vs. Veleo (1976)
Limitation to freedom to speech justified by a superior interest in preventing political corruption
INS vs Chanda (1983)
The supreme court struck down the legislative veto
Clinton vs City of New York (1998)
The supreme court ruled that the Line item veto act (1996) is unconstitutional
National federation of independent business vs Sebelius (2012)
The supreme court upheld the patient protection and affordable care act made by Obama
ART 1, section 8
Competences of the Supreme Court
ART 6
Supremacy clause = authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law of the Land so hanno la priorita su qualsiasi legge statale in conflitto
ART 5
Amending procedure (proposal [2 modi] and ratification [2 modi]) rigidity of constitution
13th amend
Abolish slavery
14th amend
Due process, equal protection, privileges and immunities
15th amend
Right to vote for everyone
16th amend
Federal Government levy taxes according to the income tax  1913 Federal Reserve (central bank)
JUDICIARY ACT (1891, 1925)
Creation of federal appellate courts
BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING ACT (1921)
Federal budget proposals to the Congress (Bureau of Budget)
VOTING RIGHTS ACT (1965)
Prohibits any racial discrimination in states’ legislation
FEDERAL ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN ACT (1971)
Control private contribution to political campaign
LINE ITEM VETO ACT (1996)
President can veto a single provision of a bill