Comm 341
🇬🇧
In English
In English
Practice Known Questions
Stay up to date with your due questions
Complete 5 questions to enable practice
Exams
Exam: Test your skills
Test your skills in exam mode
Learn New Questions
Manual Mode [BETA]
The course owner has not enabled manual mode
Specific modes
Learn with flashcards
multiple choiceMultiple choice mode
SpeakingAnswer with voice
TypingTyping only mode
Comm 341 - Leaderboard
Comm 341 - Details
Levels:
Questions:
45 questions
🇬🇧 | 🇬🇧 |
Independent variable is the variable that changes or controlled The dependent variable is tested and measured | Be able to identify Independent and Dependent variables from a hypothesis |
Researchers not put participants in a situation where they might be at risk of harm as a result of their participation. | What is involved in no harm coming to participants? |
Debriefing: you interview the person about an experience, project, or mission they've completed. | How do we make up for deception? |
Ecological fallacy is a formal fallacy in the interpretation of statistical data that occurs when inferences about the nature of individuals are deduced from inferences about the group to which those individuals belong. exceptional fallacy makes a conclusion about a group of people based on observations of or data on one individual. | Be able to identify units of analysis and identify faulty reasoning from units of analysis |
Reliability refers to how consistent the results of a study are or the consistent results of a measuring test. This can be split into internal and external reliability. ... Validity refers to whether the study or measuring test is measuring what is claims to measure. Reliability is about the consistency of a measure, and validity is about the accuracy of a measure. | Differences between and importance of reliability and validity (can know basic definitions of validity rather than all of the specific types) |
The probability that the value of a parameter falls within a specified range of values. | Confidence level: |
A range of values so defined that there is a specified probability that the value of a parameter lies within it. | Confidence interval |
Is the difference between a population parameter and a sample statistic used to estimate it. | Sampling error: |
Statistics describe a sample. A parameter describes an entire population. | Recognize a statistic versus a parameter: |
Quota sampling, convenience sampling, purposive sampling, self-selection sampling and snowball sampling. | Be able to identify probability versus non probability sampling methods and be able to label them as such |
Method for selecting survey participants that is a non-probabilistic version of stratified sampling. | Quota sampling |
Is a non-probability sampling technique where subjects are selected because of their convenient accessibility and proximity to the researcher. | Convenience sampling |
Is a form of non-probability sampling in which researchers rely on their own judgment when choosing members of the population to participate in their study | Purposive sampling |
Snowball sampling is a nonprobability sampling technique where existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances. | Snowball sampling |
Leads to confusing questions. | Double barrelled |
Cost, time, and if it is legit. | Ordering the survey |
Stratified sampling and cluster sampling. | Sampling considerations in content analysis |
A sheet of paper printed with a form on which one can conveniently write a coded program. | Code sheet: |
The manifest content is the actual literal subject matter of the dream while the latent content is the underlying meaning of these symbols | Identify latent versus manifest content |
Refers to the extent to which two or more independent coders agree on the coding of the content of interest with an application of the same coding scheme. | Demonstrate an understanding of what intercoder reliability is for |
Content analysis Analysis of existing statistics Comparative and historical analysis | Types of Unobtrusive Research |
Limited to recorded communication | Weaknesses of content analysis |