SEARCH
You are in browse mode. You must login to use MEMORY

   Log in to start

level: Level 1

Questions and Answers List

level questions: Level 1

QuestionAnswer
social psychologystudy of how people influence others' behaviour, beliefs and attitudes
need-to-belong theoryhumans have a biologically based need for interpersonal connections
social comparison theorytheory that we seek to evaluate our abilities and beliefs by comparing them with those of others
upward social comparisoncomparing to superior people
downward social comparisoncomparing to inferior people
mass hysteriaoutbreak of irrational behaviour that is spread by social contagion
collective delusionsmany people simultaneously coming or be convinced of bizarre things that are false
urban legendsfalse stories repeated so many times that people believe them to be true
social facilitationenhancement of performance brought about by the presence of others
social disruptiona worsening of performance in the presence of others
attributionprocess of assigning causes to behaviour
fundamental attribution errortendency to overestimate the impact of dispositional influences on other people's behaviour
conformitytendency of people to alter their behaviour as a result of group pressure
deindividuationtendency of people to engage in uncharacteristic behaviour when they are stripped of their usual identities
groupthinkemphasis on group unanimity at the expense of critical thinking
group polarisationtendency of group discussion to strengthen the dominant positions held by individual group members
cultsgroup of individuals who exhibit intense and unquestioning devotion to a single cause
inoculation effectapproach to convincing people to change their minds about something by first introducing reasons why the perspective might be correct and then debunking them
obedienceadhere to instructions from those of higher authority
how is obedience a double-edged sword?- society runs smooth because of obedience - obedience can cause trouble if we stop asking why we are obeying
explain the Milgram Paradigm- researcher, confederate and participant, the researcher is the 'teacher' and the confederate is the 'learner'. You do a paired-associate task, with each mistake you issue a painful shock (range of shocks) to the learner - shock will increase with each mistake
pluralistic ignoranceerror of assuming that no one in a group perceives things as we do
diffusion of responsibilityreduction in feelings of personal responsibility in the presence of others
social loafingphenomenon whereby individuals become less productive in groups
altruismhelping others for unselfish reasons
enlightenment effectlearning about psychological research can change real-world behaviour for the better
relational aggressionform of indirect aggression prevalent in girls, involving spreading rumours, gossiping and using nonverbal putdowns for the purpose of social manipulation
beliefa conclusion regarding factual evidence
attitudebelief that includes an emotional component
self-monitoringpersonality trait that assesses the extent to which people's behaviour reflects their true feelings and attitudes
cognitive dissonance theorytheory that states that we alter our attitudes because we experience cognitive dissonance
cognitive dissonanceunpleasant mental experience of tension resulting from two conflicting thoughts or beliefs
self-perception theorytheory that we acquire our attitudes by observing our behaviours
impression management theorytheory that we do not really change our attitudes, but report that we have so that our behaviours appear consistent with out attitudes
foot-in-the-door techniquespersuasive technique involving making a small request before making a bigger one
door-in-the-face techniquepersuasive technique involving making an unreasonably large request before making the small request we're hoping to have granted
low-ball techniquepersuasive technique in which the seller of a product starts by quoting a low sales price and them mentions all of the add-on costs once the customer has agreed to purchase the product
"but you are free" techniquepersuasive technique in which we convince someone to perform a favour for us by telling them that they are free not to do it
implicit egotism effectthe finding that we are more positively disposed toward people, places or things that resemble us
name-letter effectthe finding that we're more positively disposed to people whose names contain the first letter of our first (or last) name
prejudicethe drawing of negative conclusions about a person, group of people of situation prior to evaluating the evidence
stereotypea belief, positive or negative, about the characteristics of members of a group that is applied generally to most members of the group
the ultimate attribution errorassumption that behaviours among individual members of group are due to their internal dispositions
adaptive conservatismevolutionary principle that creates a predisposition toward distrusting anything or anyone unfamiliar or different
in-group biastendency to favour individuals within our group over those from outside our group
out-group homogeneitytendency to view all individuals outside our group as highly similar
discriminationnegative behaviour toward members of out-groups
minimal intergroup paradigma laboratory method for creating groups based on arbitrary differences
scapegoat hypothesisclaim that prejudice arises from a need to blame other groups for our misfortunes
just-world hypothesisclaim that our attributions and behaviours are shaped by a deep-seated assumption that the world is fair and all things happen for a reason
explicit prejudiceunfounded negative belief of which we are aware regarding the characteristics of an out-group
implicit prejudiceunfounded negative belief of which we're unaware regarding the characteristics of an out-group
jigsaw classroomseducational approach designed to minimise prejudiced by requiring all children to make independent contributions to a shared project